Texas Tech
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
96  Jocelyn Caro SR 20:02
784  Jasmine Torres JR 21:17
1,002  Hattie Schunk SO 21:32
1,324  Denae Chapman FR 21:52
1,643  Rianna Randolph SO 22:11
1,817  Lynda Hanson JR 22:22
1,880  Maggy Mulholland SR 22:26
2,104  Bret Leigh Nance FR 22:40
2,123  Jessica Gallardo FR 22:42
2,549  Kaylee Amershek SO 23:14
National Rank #99 of 344
Mountain Region Rank #13 of 20
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 14th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.2%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jocelyn Caro Jasmine Torres Hattie Schunk Denae Chapman Rianna Randolph Lynda Hanson Maggy Mulholland Bret Leigh Nance Jessica Gallardo Kaylee Amershek
Chile Pepper Festival 10/01 1091 20:09 21:35 22:16 21:57 21:54 22:18 22:23 22:35 22:47 23:05
Santa Clara Bronco Invitational 10/15 1057 19:55 21:42 21:36 21:59 22:09 22:34 22:38 22:47 23:19
Big 12 Championship 10/29 970 19:57 20:36 21:25 21:38 22:15 23:01 22:18 22:50 22:38 23:22
Mountain Region Championships 11/11 1067 20:07 21:30 21:13 21:56 22:33 22:33





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 14.4 408 0.2 0.3 3.4 18.0 35.3 22.3 14.1 6.2 0.4



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jocelyn Caro 41.1% 79.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jocelyn Caro 17.7 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.2 1.6 2.3 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.2 4.9 4.7 4.4 5.2 4.9 4.3 5.2 4.7 4.5 3.4 3.7 3.2 3.2 2.9
Jasmine Torres 77.6
Hattie Schunk 90.6
Denae Chapman 105.8
Rianna Randolph 117.4
Lynda Hanson 122.4
Maggy Mulholland 124.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 0.2% 0.2 10
11 0.3% 0.3 11
12 3.4% 3.4 12
13 18.0% 18.0 13
14 35.3% 35.3 14
15 22.3% 22.3 15
16 14.1% 14.1 16
17 6.2% 6.2 17
18 0.4% 0.4 18
19 19
20 20
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0